Skip to content


Republicans Read S&P Report Stick Fingers in their Ears: La La la laa I Can’t Hear You!

After the devastating news yesterday that S&P intends to downgrade America’s rating from its stellar AAA status, Michele Bachmann declared “it won’t take that long” for her to start turning the ailing economy around as President.

 

When S&P changed its rating for U.S. treasury bonds from AAA to AA+, their report said both parties share in the blame while affording Republicans the most responsibility for the “political brinksmanship” in the debt limit crisis that demonstrated the government has become “less stable, less effective and less predictable.” Revenue as well as cuts were mentioned in order to bring some semblance of sanity to our chaotic economy.

 

 

During the debate over the debt ceiling, the embattled House Speaker John Boehner tried to sooth the unrest among his Conservative counterparts in hopes of avoiding a default, but Tea Party darling, Congresswoman Bachmann was his most challenging as she led a revolt over raising the debt limit.

 

 

At a Republican Party dinner at a high school in Tiffan, Tim Pawlenty, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and Thad McCotter all took turns slamming the President in hopes of garnering support while rivaling Bachmann in the August 13 straw poll in Ames. All of them staunchly oppose reining in revenue.

 

Predictably each of the GOP candidates took turns one by one, disregarding the report completely while laying the blame squarely at the President’s feet.

Bachmann said in a statement: “The United States has had a AAA credit rating since 1917. That rating has endured the great depression, World War II, Korea, Vietnam and the terrorist attacks on 9/11.
“This president has destroyed the credit rating of the United States through his failed economic policies and his inability to control government spending by raising the debt ceiling.”
In a statement, Romney said: “America’s creditworthiness just became the latest casualty in President Obama’s failed record of leadership on the economy.”
Santorum, said: “It’s an absolute failure of leadership of this president.”

 

One of the issues S&P had with America’s economy was revenue, however, Bachmann told reporters, after she becomes President she would stop tax increases and cut regulations. John Boehner, instead of focusing on how to present a bipartisan deal to present some form of order to the world’s view of politics in this country, he sent a ‘wake up call to Democrats’ without mention of revenue or his own party’s part in divisive politics.

 

While cuts were/are in dire need in order to implement a strategy in fixing our broken economy, Democrats focused on combining revenue and cuts while Republicans targeted cuts only — which is precisely what S&P’s report desired of our country – both, not one or the other, but both. One more time – both.

 

S&P’s assessment was clear, there is too much division and drama in our political system. Instead of working together, we’ve had Tea Party freshmen touting a shutdown; the majority of which are backing Bachmann.

 

Historically, the right has shouted for a shutdown while shunning any compromise, so we can only conclude after their obstinate refusal of reading what’s actually in the damned report, that this is what they wanted.

Congratu-fucking-lations! They win, America loses.

 

Image courtesy of: Eclectism

Posted in The Economy.

  • Biagio

    Don’t confuse revenue with tax rate increases, they are not automatic. You can raise tax rates, but that is no guarantee of revenue increase, people adjust their finances. Especially the wealthy, they can live off savings. Want guarantee revenue increase? Go to a national sales tax or a VAT.
    Plus, not that anyone cares, but half the country pays no income tax and 30% of those who pay nothing get refunds. These are the people complaining the rich don’t pay their “fair share”. Fair to whom?
    Tax rate increase are easy, rates have gone up and down over the years, but reducing the spending level has never happened in my lifetime.
    Even now, all they are only talking about reducing rate of increase, not an actual reduction of what is being spent, the total spending will increase. And I doubt that even the rate of increase reduction will happen (just as S&P doubts it will happen).

    • dave

      @Biagio,

      those people that don’t pay taxes fit into 1 of 3 categories.

      1) the filthy rich who have loopholes and off shoring to make sure that it doesn’t appear that they have an income so they don’t have to pay and quite often (think GE) get a large sum of money back from the government.

      2) politicians who don’t pay but get away with it. Clarience Thomas for example.

      3) The people who make below the federal poverty rate. They do actually get an earned income credit for their children which usually results in them getting some money back.

      Those in the last group are not the rich, many barely have enough to feed their families after coming home from their minimum wage jobs. Yet the Republican’ts think these are the people who should bear the burden so that the ultra rich can pad a couple more 0′s to their bank accounts.

      But they may get their way, with the cuts they want to welfare and medicare some of these people may just die and then the right will get the cuts to the programs that they depend on.

      Getting rid of the loopholes that companies use to offshore jobs, while still getting tax breaks, and making companies like GE pay some taxes (they paid nothing last year) as well as making the top 2% pitch in are the ways to get out of debt.

      • Biagio

        @dave,

        If you look at the actual figures provided by the IRS you will see that all the income taxes are paid by the “wealthy” those with incomes over $250,000.
        There is an alternative minimum tax that makes it very difficult to avoid paying any tax. Few wealthy get away with that. Certainly no judges or political figures.

        If you look at the details you will find that
        GE did not pay tax because, it earned most of its income outside the United States and the laws state you do not pay US tax on that money unless you bring the money back to the United States, additionally the laws state that if you lose money one year in the USA and cannot deduct it, you can carry the loss forward to years with profits (NOL), GE had a net losses in financing operations and could not deduct them so they used it to offset profits this year. Those are the laws, congress wrote them.
        If you don’t like the tax breaks check who wrote what you don’t like, most likely at least half are from Democrats they controlled the tax committees for over 40 years.

        Finally something that really concerns me is that you (and others) seem to feel that this country owns these companies. It doesn’t. We are in a global economy and increasingly more US companies make more money outside the US than in it. GM is a good example, they lost money in US made all their money in China. They have more employees outside the USA then in it. Keep making it difficult to do business here, and they will become foreign companies doing business in the USA, (like Nissan).It would be easier since that is where they make most of their money, and have most of their employees. and foreign governments will certainly make it easier to do business outside the USA than in it.
        Right now the National Labor Relations board is stopping Boeing from building a plant in South Carolina because it is a non union state, but they cannot do anything if Boeing decided to build the plant overseas. I guess the people in South Carolina are not americans unless they join a union.

        Finally the amount of the US debt is so large most cannot conceive it, If we take 100% of all the income “the rich” earn over $1 million per year, we will have enough money to run the country for two (2) weeks. Yes revenue (the money coming in) is a problem, but that is directly related to the recession not the rich not paying their fair share. The major problem is the spending. I think that will sadly correct itself shortly. S&P downgrade is just the beginning.We are actually now lending money to outselves, (from the Federal Reserve) because others will not. It is a house of cards that is close to falling apart.

  • Biagio

    Do a reality check, the downgrade is because we are deeply in debt, and going deeper with each day. (40 cents for every dollar spend).
    The cause is a combination of out of control spending (including 2 & 1/2 wars) and a recession.
    If you beleive it is easy to increase revenue in a recession, you are clueless, raising rates will not increase revenue by any significant amount, there are not the profits there to tax. In the past Democrats have increased revenues by lowering taxes, but that was in a good economy.
    Tea party people are saying reduce spending, most Democrats think we should stop the wars. Both make sense, but the yo-yo’s in power will do neither.

    • http://FreakOutNation.com Anomaly100

      @Biagio, History begs to differ. Revenue + cuts is the only way if we are in such bad shape.

  • Mike B

    There is an old joke, about some one who died and went to hell. As he/she was being escorted to their alloted spot, was given a tour. Each punishment matched the sin. While passing the worst spot in hell of indescribable horror, the newcomer asked the demon, who was in such a terrible place, and the demon replied “oh, those are the people who couldn’t make up their minds which side they were on”. Apathy is a terrible thing my friends and apathy is what got us here. This all happened not only because of the right wing agenda, but because some of my “sorry ass” fellow democrats wont go to the polls and vote, and believe me there are enough of us across this nation to make a difference. This is the problem in my state of Florida. It is truly shameful. We reap what we sow, or dont sow.

    • http://FreakOutNation.com Anomaly100

      @Mike B, Well said and I am truly disgusted when I hear talk of Dems not voting as if, it will change things for the better. That makes no sense.

  • Pingback: Blog News- Left and Right Views » FreakOutNation » Republicans Read S&P Report Stick Fingers in …

  • House Speaker

    As the House Speaker I would like to apologize for being a wuss. I should never have whored myself out for support from the teabagger party. I realize I could have stopped them from destroying America but you must understand that I wanted to keep my job because I wanted to show Nancy Pelosi a thing or two. Surely you can understand that I was bitter. A woman should never have my job.

    Sorry America,
    John Boehner

    • http://FreakOutNation.com Anomaly100

      @House Speaker, Sorry John but we can’t forgive you until you call your baggers off.