Skip to content


Whitney: Tea Party Members are Freaked out White Men Representing Our Current Predicament

According to high profile banking analyst Meredith Whitney, Tea Party members are primarily “freaked out white men” who pose the greatest political threat to Democrats in 2012.

 

While discussing the Standard & Poor’s downgrade of U.S. debt, Whitney said the dissenters represent the type of problems that have led to the current predicament in Washington.

Jeff Cox from CNBC reports:

“Call it Tea Party, whatever you will, the fringe element is as I characterize (as) freaked-out white men who are unemployed and have been unemployed for three years and they’re scared to death,” she said. “Three to four million of them are about to roll off unemployment benefits in the next three to four months. This is only going to get worse.”

Whitney forewarns that Democrats looking to stay in the White House and regain full control of Congress will need to take note.

“For this reason you have to deal with the structural issues,” Whitney said. “If you are a Machiavellian Democrat you want to deal with this issue and defuse the Tea Party as fast as you possibly can because this poses the biggest threat to their re-election in 2012.”

Ms. Whitney states that extending unemployment benefits anymore than they have been is not the answer.

“You feel better about yourself when you’re working. Kids feel better about their parents when they’re working. Having a job is more than having a paycheck,” Whitney said. “To push for the extension of unemployment benefits is going to and should unleash absolute backlash against this administration because that’s a horrendous idea.”

 

Gawker reports Santelli’s reply:

 

Would-be pretender to the Tea Party throne Rick Santelli took to the airwaves to trash another monarch today on CNBC: King George III, who he brought back from the dead to compare to a banking analyst that dismissed the Tea Party as “freaked out white men who are unemployed.” Railing about the importance of the Founding Fathers, he left analyst Meredith Whitney asking herself, “What have I done to you?”

 

One thing is certain, with the poll taken last year, concluding that only 1% of Tea Partiers are African American and given their unhidden anger, the lady has a point. They’ve been angry since the moment Barack Obama was sworn in.

 

Image: Tea Party activists

Posted in Politics, tea party.

Tagged with , .

  • Anony

    Can there be some criticism of the Tea Party that doesn’t devolve into racism/sexism? Or in this case, start with it. Oh, noes! White people! Worst of all, male people! That must mean they’re pure ebil, since stereotypes hold that all ebilness comes from white maleness.

    • http://FreakOutNation.com Anomaly100

      @Anony, It would help if they had denounced the racist tea party signs they held in their white hands at the rallies. But, no, they did not; they encouraged it.

      It would also help if Andrew Breitbart did not retaliate accusations of racism by highly editing a film of Shirley Sherrod who was a victim of the KKK during her life.

      It it walks like a duck…

  • Joshua

    They’ve been freaked out that it wasn’t going to be another white guy as POTUS. Most of their rage comes from racism, you can be sure of that. The rest is anger that EVERY person should feel toward a government that, in all levels (whether dem, repub, or independent), has failed its people. That part of the tea party gives me hope, the rest is all focused racism repackaged as political dissent.

  • amos victor

    The Tea Party is a collection of idiots who blame the current legally elected president for failed policies of that moron who trashed the US economy between the years 2000-2008.

    • http://FreakOutNation.com Anomaly100

      @amos victor, Sssh! You didn’t get the memo? They don’t want us to bring up Bush – that way they can dismiss everything he’s done to our country.

  • Roger

    “They’ve been angry since the moment Barack Obama was sworn in.” Requires correction.

    Should be “They’ve been angry since the moment Barack Obama announced his intentions to run for President.”

    • M.Funkibut

      @Roger,
      Disagree

      The S.A.W.B. take on Obama announcing his intentions to run for POTUS was “Who would vote for a black guy?” Only they probably used the N-word.

      The S.A.W.B. take on Obama winning the Democratic Party Nomination was “Now McCain will surely win because who’s gonna vote for a black guy?” Only they used the N-word again.

      It was only when Obama won that the freak-out occurred because never in the furthest reaches of their tiny, tiny minds did they concieve the possibility of him winning the Presidency.

      November 5th 2011 is when they got angry.

      • Roger

        @M.Funkibut

        Not arguing but I invite you to remember tales of the Madrassa from FOX in the early days. Wearing flag pins. It got so stupid some political cartoonist made fun of FOX.

        I know FOX and the Tea Party are not officially related but many would disagree w/that too.