Wash, rinse, repeat. A Pro-life activist can’t seem to comprehend why a woman wouldn’t want a mandatory forced trans-vaginal ultrasound prior to receiving medication to induce abortion, and then another one in a follow-up two weeks after the procedure. In fact, some do not understand that if the pregnancy is not wanted, there might be a really, really good reason. Hint: There always is a good reason.
RN Reality Check reports:
Indiana Right to Life legislative director Sue Swayze, who yesterday joined in with a number of Indiana Right to Life members to testify in favor of restrictions on RU-486 that would require the Lafayette, Indiana Planned Parenthood clinic to rebuild and reclassify as a surgical abortion center in order to continue providing medication abortions.
Swayze is now responding to critics who claim the multiple unnecessary probings are invasive.
Saying “she doesn’t understand the problem with the procedure,” Swayze told Brandon Smith of WBAA, “I got pregnant vaginally. Something else could come in my vagina for a medical test that wouldn’t be that intrusive to me. So I find that argument a little ridiculous.”
“Something else could come in my vagina for a medical test”? This is why lobbyists should not be writing medical policy.
Well shit. Ms. Swayze doesn’t read the news. Some women are raped and do not wish to carry her rapist’s baby. To force a victim to undergo this invasive procedure not once but twice, is highly insensitive. Meaning, the rape victim didn’t want the man’s penis in her vagina to begin with. Go figure! I can’t believe we have to have this discussion in 2013. The party that wants the Gubbermint out of their lives, want it right up our vaginas — twice. And we’ve only touched on one reason for an unwanted pregnancy. There’s poverty, teenage pregnancy and a host of others.
Image: Under the Mountain Bunker